Thursday, September 22, 2011

PM Harper: We all do look forward to the day when the two sides are at the bargaining table

Prime Minister Stephen Harper rallied to the side of Israel on Wednesday, saying the best road for peace in the Middle East lies through negotiations between that country and the Palestinians.

Harper made his move in a meeting at the United Nations with Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

As journalists were allowed into the room for a brief photo-op, both men smiled warmly and shook hands as they spoke to the cameras.

Harper told journalists he was going to talk with his counterpart about the "terrific" Canada-Israel relationship in areas such as the economy, culture, and "some of the great challenges" now being debated at the UN.
"I would be remiss, without delving too much into what is going on here, to say we all do look forward to the day when the two sides are at the bargaining table and making the tough decisions that are necessary to have two peaceful and secure democratic states."
For his part, Netanyahu was effusive in his praise.

He said that Israel knows that nobody wants Middle East peace more "than our friends in Canada and our friend, the prime minister."
"Israel and Canada have a lot in common — the same heart, the same values. And that I say with great appreciation — for your stance, for your conviction, for your friendship."

"And I share, too, your desire to resume direct negotiations for peace and get on with it. Because the only way we can finish peace negotiations is by beginning peace negotiations. And I know that we'll have your support in our quest for peace and security."

FM Lieberman on Obama's UN speech: "It was a speech by an ally."

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman lauded US President Barack Obama's pro-Israel UN speech on Wednesday, saying "I can welcome and sign off on this speech with both my hands. It was a speech by an ally."

The foreign minister added that Israel has "shown much flexibility and we respect the American requests.

Israeli Ambassador to the US Michael Oren expressed his satisfaction over Obama's UN speech, and said that it is not yet clear whether the Palestinians have majority support for their statehood bid at the UN Security Council.

Oren told Ynet that "Congress has made it clear that there will be consequences to any Palestinian attempt to declare independence through the UN, and I think that the Palestinians are completely aware of this stance."

Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday responded to US President Barck Obama's speech,, saying the address was proof of the strong relationship between the American leader and Israel.
"Once again it's been proven to all the doubters, President Obama is an ally and friend of Israel. The Obama administration gives backing to Israel's security in a wide, all-encompassing and unprecedented manner."

Netanyahu: Obama deserves a 'Badge of Honor' for Stance On Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday said that direct negotiations was the only way to achieve a stable Middle East peace, maintaining that the Palestinian effort to secure UN recognition of statehood "will not succeed."

Moments before his joint meeting with US President Barack Obama in New York, Netanyahu lauded the American President, Barack Obama "for standing with Israel and supporting peace through direct negotiations. We both agree that this is the only way."

"Palestinians deserve a state, but it's a state that has to make peace with Israel, and therefore the attempt to shortcut this process will not succeed. I think the Palestinians want to achieve a state through the international community, but they are not prepared yet to give peace to Israel in return."
Netanyahu went on to praise the President for taking strong suppportive stance in support of Israel:
"I think, standing your ground, taking this position of principle, which is also the right position to achieve peace, this is a badge of Honor, and i want to thank you for wearing that Badge of Honor...and i hope others will follow your example..."
During their joint press conference, Obama reiterated his commitment to Israel, saying:
"I think it's fair to say that today our security cooperation is stronger than it has ever been.Peace cannot be imposed – it has to be negotiated. Israelis and Palestinians sitting down together and working through these very difficult issues that have kept the parties apart for decades now; that is what I know is the ultimate goal for all of us – two states, side by side, living in peace and security," he added.

"Recent events in the region remind us how fragile peace can be, and why the pursuit of Middle East peace is more urgent than ever."

Obama: Israel deserves recognition. It deserves normal relations with its neighbors

US President Barack Obama on Wednesday rejected Palestinian plans to seek UN recognition for statehood and urged a return to peace talks with Israel as he tried to head off a looming diplomatic disaster.


Addressing world leaders at the opening of the UN General Assembly, Obama said that the Palestinians deserved a state of their own, but that this would only be achieved through negotiations.
"I am convinced that there is no shortcut to the end of a conflict that has endured for decades. Peace will not come through statements and resolutions at the UN."

"Ultimately, it is Israelis and Palestinians -- not us -- who must reach agreement on the issues that divide them: on borders and security; on refugees and Jerusalem."

"One year ago, I stood at this podium and called for an independent Palestine. I believed then – and I believe now – that the Palestinian people deserve a state of their own. But what I also said is that genuine peace can only be realized between Israelis and Palestinians themselves."

"One year later,despite extensive efforts by America and others, the parties have not bridged their differences. Faced with this stalemate, I put forward a new basis for negotiations in May. That basis is clear, and well known to all of us here. Israelis must know that any agreement provides assurances for their security. Palestinians deserve to know the territorial basis of their state.

"I know that many are frustrated by the lack of progress. So am I. But the question isn’t the goal we seek – the question is how to reach it. And I am convinced that there is no short cut to the end of a conflict that has endured for decades."

"We seek a future where Palestinians live in a sovereign state of their own, with no limit to what they can achieve. There is no question that the Palestinians have seen that vision delayed for too long."

"America’s commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable, and our friendship with Israel is deep and enduring. And so we believe that any lasting peace must acknowledge the very real security concerns that Israel faces every single day.

"Let’s be honest: Israel is surrounded by neighbors that have waged repeated wars against it. Israel’s citizens have been killed by rockets fired at their houses and suicide bombs on their buses. Israel’s children come of age knowing that throughout the region, other children are taught to hate them."

"Israel,a small country of less than eight million people, looks out at a world where leaders of much larger nations threaten to wipe it off of the map. The Jewish people carry the burden of centuries of exile, persecution, and the fresh memory of knowing that six million people were killed simply because of who they were."

"These facts cannot be denied. The Jewish people have forged a successful state in their historic homeland. Israel deserves recognition. It deserves normal relations with its neighbors. And friends of the Palestinians do them no favors by ignoring this truth, just as friends of Israel must recognize the need to pursue a two state solution with a secure Israel next to an independent Palestine.

"That truth – that each side has legitimate aspirations – is what makes peace so hard. And the deadlock will only be broken when each side learns to stand in each other’s shoes."

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Danny Ayalon tells Newsmax TV: Palestinians Making 'Mockery' of U.N.

(Newsmax). Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon tells Newsmax that Palestinians seeking statehood at the United Nations want a “rubber stamp to their capricious conduct” — and says the U.N. won’t solve anything “the parties themselves do not solve.”

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV, Ayalon was asked why the United Nations should not recognize a Palestinian state.
“Because it will make a mockery of international conduct and traditions,South Sudan is the latest country to join the U.N. How did they join the U.N.? After they finished bilateral negotiations. Then they brought it to the United Nations.

“So by trying to put this process on its head, I believe not only Israelis and Palestinians will suffer, but any conflict in the world will become much more intransigent. The U.N. cannot solve anything that the parties themselves do not solve.”

As for Israel’s options if the Palestinians proceed with their statehood effort, Ayalon says:
“If this happens we will have to reconsider our steps. We are not beholden to the obligations according to the [Israeli-Palestinian] agreements. The Palestinians broke these agreements, and we will have to take action according to our interests.

“We may have to wait until there is more reasonable and more sensible leadership on the Palestinian side.”
The number one priority for Israel now “is to continue the peace process with the Palestinians,” Ayalon adds.
“We call upon the Palestinians to stop this unilateral effort and come to the table. We have been waiting for them.

“What has derailed the peace process is the refusal of the Palestinians to come forward and sit with us without preconditions.

“They keep saying no. They’ve always wanted everything, and this approach of all or nothing is the main stumbling block today. And for the U.N. to accept this approach of all or nothing, because they use their automatic majority, not only is it a blow to the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians, it’s also a blow to the image of the United Nations, because if the Palestinians can render the United Nations a rubber stamp to their capricious conduct, this may bode ill for other parties, for other conflicts around the world.”

Pew Research : Americans not aware of the Palestinians counerproductive move at the UN

Bibi needs to invest in some serious Hasbara tour across America, to explain the US public, how counterproductive a UN vote of a Unilateral declaration of Statehood, is for peace.

(Pewresearch).Americans express mixed opinions about a possible independent Palestinian state, an issue that has so far drawn little attention from the press or the public. More favor (42%) than oppose (26%) the United States recognizing Palestine as an independent nation, while nearly a third (32%) express no opinion.

Yet the public’s sympathies in the Middle East dispute remain more with Israel than the Palestinians: 40% say they sympathize more with Israel, while just 10% sympathize more with the Palestinians; 21% volunteer that they sympathize with neither side, while 25% express no opinion.

More than half of Democrats (54%) say the U.S. should recognize Palestine as an independent nation while just 14% oppose this step. Among independents, more favor (45%) than oppose (28%) the U.S. recognizing an independent Palestinian state. But just 27% of Republicans favor U.S. recognition for Palestine, while 38% are opposed.

Far more Republicans sympathize with Israel (62%) than with the Palestinians (4%) or sympathize with neither side (14%) and 18% have no opinion.

By contrast, 27% of Democrats say they sympathize with Israel while nearly as many (24%) volunteer that they sympathize with neither side; 15% of Democrats sympathize with the Palestinians. Nearly three-in-ten Democrats (29%) offer no opinion. Among independents, 41% sympathize with Israel, 22% with neither Israel nor the Palestinians, and 10% the Palestinians; 24% express no opinion.

37% say Obama is striking the right balance in his handling of the situation in the Middle East ; 20% say he favors the Palestinians too much and just 5% say he favors Israel too much.

Ehud Barak tells Piers Morgan: Obama "is friendly to Israel, especially in security-related issues"


Piers Morgan exclusively interviews Ehud Barak tonight, and the Israeli Defense Minister weighed in on Pres. Barack Obama's Middle East policy. "He is friendly to Israel, especially in security-related issues," he said. "He is also trying, to the best of my judgement, to be even-handed with the Palestinians."

Barak wouldn't comment directly on the 2012 race, but he did refute Rick Perry's statements about the Obama administration today. "I don't think appeasement is an accurate description of the policy of this administration," he said.

Congressman Turner: US Foreign Policy must be - adherence to the Truth and acknowledgment of who our friends are



Statement earlier today releaes by NY9 Congressman Bob Turner:
"The Palestinian Authority has not acted as a responsible partner for peace with Israel. It continues to pay - with U.S. dollars - terrorists in Israeli prisons convicted of murdering Israeli civilians, and it has done nothing to stop the incessant shelling of Israeli towns. I continue to believe that all U.S. funding to the Palestinian Authority be halted until these matters are addressed.

"Statehood, which can only happen under the terms of the 1993 Oslo Accord, is out of the question at this time. If the United Nations truly wants to stand up against terrorism, it has a moral obligation to deny this request."

Mitt Romney: Obama must unequivocally reaffirm the U.S. commitment to the security of Israel

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney released on Tuesday a statement on the Palestinian statehood bid at the United Nations, blasting President Obama's policies toward Israel for the situation.
“What we are watching unfold at the United Nations is an unmitigated diplomatic disaster, It is the culmination of President Obama’s repeated efforts over three years to throw Israel under the bus and undermine its negotiating position. That policy must stop now."

"In his speech to the U.N. this week, President Obama must unequivocally reaffirm the United States’ commitment to the security of Israel and its continued existence as a Jewish state," Romney said. "And he must make clear that if the Palestinian Authority succeeds in gaining any type of U.N. recognition, the United States will cut foreign assistance to the Palestinians, as well as re-evaluate its funding of U.N. programs and its relationship with any nation voting in favor of recognition. Actions that compromise the interests of the United States, our allies, and all those who desire a lasting peace must have consequences.”

Netanyahu: Israel will stand up for its rights, and present the Truth at the U.N.

PM Netnayahu convened Likud ministers and Knesset members for a festive toast ahead of his trip to New York, where he will deliver a speech at the United Nations General Assembly to counter the Palestinian statehood bid.
In his address, the prime minister vowed to stand up for Israel's rights at the UN.
"I know the reception I received here is much warmer than the one I will receive at the UN, and exactly because of that I think we should go there and present our truth… of a people attacked over and over by those opposed to their very existence. That is the most basic truth."

"We are extending our hand in peace. I said that the way to peace is through direct negotiations and not through unilateral declarations in the UN. In order to reach the end of negotiations, we need to start negotiations. That is something Israel is willing to do and that is something the Palestinians have avoided doing."


"There is growing global recognition of the need to solve the various issues on the subject. We want peace with security arrangements and that means a serious meeting and insistence on our most essential interests is necessary. It is much easier to give in to pressure, much easier to gain applause from the international community by making immense concessions."

Rick Perry: Every nation within the U.N. must know - America stands with Israel

Republican presidential candidate Governor Rick Perry appeared alongside Jewish leaders in New York Tuesday to pledge unwavering support to Israel and call on the Obama administration to take a stronger stance against the statehood bid.

Perry accused President Obama of fostering a policy of “appeasement” in the Middle East, blaming him for the standoff at the United Nations over the Palestinian bid for statehood recognition.
"We are indignant that certain Middle Eastern leaders have discarded the principle of direct negotiations between the sovereign nation of Israel and the Palestinian leadership, and we are equally indignant that the Obama Administration’s Middle East policy of appeasement has encouraged such an ominous act of bad faith.

Simply put, we would not be here today at the precipice of such a dangerous move if the Obama Policy in the Middle East wasn’t naïve, arrogant, misguided and dangerous..."
Perry called on the U.S. to approach the Middle East with a “new firmness and a new resolve.”
With the end-run on Palestinian statehood imminent before the U.N., America must act swiftly.

First, every nation within the U.N. must know America stands with Israel and the Oslo accord principle of direct negotiations without equivocation.

Second, America must make it clear that a declaration of Palestinian Statehood in violation of the spirit of the Oslo accords could jeopardize our funding of U.N. operations.

Third, the Palestinians must know their gambit comes with consequences in particular that America will have to reconsider the $4 billion in assistance we have provided to the Palestinians over the last 17 years.

Fourth, we should close the PLO office in Washington if the U.N. grants the standing of a Palestinian state.

And fifth, we must signal to the world, including nations like Turkey and Egypt whom we have considered allies in recent years, that we won’t tolerate aggression against Israel.

It is time to change our policy of appeasement toward the Palestinians to strengthen our ties to the nation of Israel, and in the process establish a robust American position in the Middle East characterized by a new firmness and a new resolve."
During a question-and-answer session afterward, Perry reiterated that if the U.N. offered statehood to Palestine, the United States should think about revoking its financial support for the international body.

Perry offered a more moderate but articulated Foreign policy vision.

"I do support a two-state solution – only if the nation of israel and the Palestinian authorities do sit down and have direct negotiations with each other," he said.

Perry's also promised that, "as the President of the United States, if you want to work for the State Department, you will be working in Jerusalem" — a signal that the American embassy should be moved from its current location in Tel Aviv.

Perry doesn't seem to share such concerns. "I hope you will tell the people of Israel that help is on the way," he said to applause. Whether Perry will be able to follow through on his promises depends, to some degree, on whether he's the Chosen People's choice.

Monday, September 19, 2011

House Speaker Boehner: 'Israel Is Not Isolating Itself – Israel is Leading in the Middle East'

Speaker of the House John Boehner reiterated his commitment to Israel yesterday, in a speech given at the Jewish National Fund’s 2011 National Conference in Cincinnati.
“Like you, I have read suggestions by newspaper columnists and observers that events have overtaken Israel … that Israel is ‘isolating itself’ in the Middle East.

“That view is wrong, and always has been wrong.

“Israel is not isolating itself – Israel is leading in the Middle East.

“Israel does not stand alone – Israel stands above as the one true beacon of freedom and opportunity in the Middle East.

“We’re here to see that Israel continues to thrive – and to make clear it is America’s duty to stand by her side. Not just as a broker or observer – but as a strong partner and reliable ally.

“That’s why I’m pleased to report that the House has ensured – in this time of fiscal responsibility – that America meets its financial commitments to Israel.

“I’ve been Speaker of the House more than eight months now … we’ve had some significant moments in the chamber.

“For me, one of the most powerful occurred in May when Prime Minister Netanyahu addressed a Joint Meeting of Congress.

“It was my honor to invite him. It was the least I could do for the leader of one of our closest allies in the world.

“Bibi did not disappoint. He received nearly 30 standing ovations … bipartisan standing ovations. All well-deserved....the American people deserved to hear from him – and Washington, quite frankly, needed to hear what he had to say.

“I invite the people in this room – and anyone as concerned as I am about the future of Israel – to speak out. Washington needs to hear from you, too.

“For this to be a truly transformational time, one thing cannot change … and that is America’s commitment to Israel’s future.

“Something the prime minister said in his speech to Congress has stuck with me.

“He was talking about how the Middle East stands at a crossroads. And he said: ‘Like all of you, I pray that the peoples of the region choose the path less traveled, the path of liberty.’

“It is the path less traveled isn’t it? We know freedom and democracy don’t come cheap. They require vigilance – they rely on the tools of persuasion and progress.

“Among those tools are strategic alliances built on trust, not fear or coercion.

“Our democracies are cut from the same cloth. Our peoples treasure the same values.

“Supporting Israel and her people has been the policy of this nation since Harry Truman sat in the Oval Office.

“Our commitment to Israel should be no less strong today. If anything, it should be stronger than it’s ever been. And, with your help, it will be. It must be.

“The lesson here is simple: words matter. The truth can pierce even the most stubborn defenses.

“It is up to us to tell Israel’s story … to spread Israel’s truth. The voice of America starts with the people in this room.

Ed Koch/ UN Durban III Conference Will Give Legitimacy to Anti-Semitic Rants

(Edward Koch-Newsmax).The Durban III Conference is scheduled to be held in New York City on Sept. 21. The two prior Durban conferences — Durban I held in 2001 in Durban, South Africa, and Durban II held in 2009 in Geneva, Switzerland — were supposedly called into session to address racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance.

It instantly became clear that the conferences had been hijacked by Muslim nations for the purpose of trashing Israel and directing hate at Jews everywhere.

The attacks upon Israel and Jews rivaled the worst manifestations of anti-Semitism seen anyplace since Hitler’s Nazi Germany engaged in their campaign to dehumanize Jews leading to the Final Solution and the murder of 6 million Jews.

The false charges against Israel and worldwide Jewry at Durban I and II have undoubtedly caused safety problems for the Jewish citizens of many nations, particularly in the underdeveloped countries of the world seeking the favor of the oil-rich Arab countries.

Durban III undoubtedly will have the same kind of hate-filled rhetoric directed at both Israel and Jews everywhere. Of that I have no doubt. Today, across the world, anti-Semitism is rising in countries such as Great Britain, France, and Russia and increasing in Scandinavia and elsewhere in the European Union as well.

Many of these countries seeking lucrative oil contracts with the Arab countries and fearful of the outcomes of the uprisings that have taken place in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and Yemen, but seeking to be seen as supporting those uprisings, are willing to denounce Israel, hoping to avoid confrontation in their own countries with the rising Muslim populations there.

Many of those European countries undoubtedly believe that throwing Israel under the bus is a small price to pay for an accommodation with the Islamic world.

The Muslim Arab countries, having failed on five occasions to defeat Israel on the battlefield, are now seeking to win a diplomatic victory at the U.N. which will deprive Israel of secure and defensible borders, end negotiations between the parties, and impose a Munich-like settlement on Israel.

In addition, through their false accusations and hatred of Jews worthy of Hitler, they will once again at the so-called Durban III Conference on Sept. 21 engage in an exercise of Jew hatred.

The conference will not succeed because the United States, at the direction of President Obama, will not participate in the proposed auto-da-fe.

It will not succeed because countries of conscience such as Canada will not participate.

On June 1, the Obama administration confirmed that the U.S. would boycott the conference. Joseph Macmanus, acting U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs, stated that the Durban process “included ugly displays of intolerance and anti-Semitism.”

Jews who came to the land now known as Israel and Palestine with the sojourn of their patriarch and founder, Abraham, have lived there for over 3,000 years. They were carried off into slavery after war with Babylonia in 587 BCE.

Then, the Persian King Cyrus permitted them to return to Jerusalem in 538 BCE. Many were once again carried off into slavery by the Romans in 70 CE, but some Jews always remained in the land. They began their return in large numbers at the urgings of Theodore Herzl, culminating in the declaration of statehood by Ben Gurion who became its first prime minister.

Today, there are living in Israel 5.8 million Jews and 1.6 million Arabs, all full citizens of that democratic state. I have no doubt whether one believes in God or does not, that the people of Israel and the 13 million Jews who live in this world making up one-fifth of one percent of the world’s population will survive this latest attack upon them by their enemies.

14 US Senators urge Obama to support Israel during UN Assembly speech

(AFP) 14 US senators urged President Barack Obama on Monday to use his speech to the United Nations to restate strong US support for Israel amid tensions with Turkey and a Palestinian push for statehood.

The 14 Senators urged Obama to "utilise the opportunity offered by your address at the United Nations to reaffirm and explain America''s determination to stand by Israel at this difficult hour."
"We are deeply disappointed that President Mahmoud Abbas appears determined to scorn your persistent efforts to persuade him to return to the negotiating table with Israel and instead seek unilateral diplomatic action in New York that will only set back the prospects for peace."

"The world needs to hear unequivocally from you that Israel -- our friend, ally, and strategic partner -- is not alone in facing these threats."
The senators accused Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of "anti-Israeli rhetoric," the attack on the Israeli embassy in Cairo, and the Palestinians' push to raise their status at the world body.
"We believe it is imperative for you to speak strongly, forthrightly and publicly about US concerns over these developments."

"We need to make it clear that we will not tolerate continued threats to Israel by governments or individuals in the region or attempts to delegitimize Israel at the UN or other international forums. Violence and unilateralism against Israel will be met with the strongest US opposition."
Democratic Senators Robert Menendez, Bob Casey, Kirsten Gillibrand, Dick Blumenthal, Ben Cardin, Chuck Schumer, and Chris Coons, Republican Senators Jon Kyl, Susan Collins, Mark Kirk, Orrin Hatch, Marco Rubio, and Johnny Isakson, as well as Independent Senator Joe Lieberman signed the letter.

The lawmakers warned "political and physical attacks on Israel" raised "the possibility of a region-wide deterioration into violence" and that "Israel's real sense of growing isolation will make it much more difficult to move the Mideast in a positive direction."

Un Ambassador Prosor in LAtimes: Abbas' pursuit of virtual statehood - fantasy of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

(Ambassador Prosor Op-Ed in LATimes). In Lewis Carroll's "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," the heroine falls down a rabbit hole into a confusing fantasy world. Writing today, Carroll might have placed Alice in the 66th General Assembly of the United Nations, where Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas plans this week to seek U.N. recognition of statehood. If Alice was perplexed by the Mad Hatter or the Queen of Hearts, it would be interesting to see her reaction to a president whose mandate has long expired applying for statehood over territory, part of which he is too afraid to visit. Her confusion would be compounded on discovering that a majority of the world's states were happy to indulge this fantasy.

The truth is that the head of the Palestinian Authority has absolutely no authority in the Gaza Strip. Abbas has not set foot in Gaza since the Hamas terrorist organization carried out a bloody coup and took control of the area in 2007. It's like New York City electing a mayor who is unable to travel to Brooklyn.

Every state recognized by the U.N. has the obligation to be willing and able to exert its authority over its own territory. Is Abbas willing and able to control Hamas? Perhaps the citizens of southern Israel, semi-permanent residents of bomb shelters, could offer an informed answer. The continued rain of Hamas rockets, mortar shells and missiles on Israeli homes, hospitals and schools provides a vivid illustration that the Palestinian Authority is both unwilling and unable to uphold this basic requirement.

True friends of the Palestinians in the international community should urge them to return immediately to direct talks with Israel. No one but Israelis and Palestinians, on their own, at the table, can face the major challenges that must be addressed if peace is to be achieved. This unilateral action does the opposite, enabling the Palestinian Authority to sidestep negotiations, while standing in violation of every bilateral agreement between Palestinian leaders and Israel since the Oslo accords.

It also encourages reckless behavior in an already fragile region. Voting for this unilateral gambit is a recipe for instability, the breakdown of cooperation and, potentially, violence. Passing resolutions in the General Assembly requires no concessions, no leadership and no responsibility from the Palestinians. The inevitable talks with Israel will not be as easy. They will entail hard work, frustration and many sleepless nights, but negotiations remain the only way forward.

While Palestinians leaders are crying for unilateral recognition, those who support this measure may be soon crying about its consequences.

The pursuit of virtual statehood falls in the same realm of fantasy that Alice discovers in Wonderland, all white rabbits and red herrings. Only in the real world, in a direct dialogue filled with difficult truths and serious compromises, can Israelis and Palestinians forge a viable, secure and long-lasting peace

Sen. John Thune: Four Things Obama Must Do to Counter the Palestinian U.N. Statehood Gambit

(Sen. John Thune-FoxNews.com)....An intense diplomatic effort by the Obama administration is reportedly underway to forestall the misguided Palestinian effort.

President Obama should make four things very clear as part of this effort:
1. The United States will veto any effort in the Security Council to grant statehood to the Palestinians and vote against any effort to change their status within the General Assembly.


2. The United States will halt all financial assistance to the Palestinians if they continue with this course of action.


3. The United States will re-evaluate its contributions to any U.N. institution changing the Palestinians’ status.


4. The United States will re-evaluate its foreign aid posture with respect to any state voting in favor of altering the current status of the Palestinians at the United Nations.
In 1993, as part of the Oslo Peace Process, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat wrote to the Prime Minister of Israel to say that “all outstanding issues relating to permanent status will be resolved through negotiations.” After that, both sides agreed multiple times that neither party would “change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip” prior to the completion of negotiations on “final status” issues.

The recognition of a Palestinian state with defined borders is easily one of the most important of these final status issues to be resolved between Israel and the Palestinians. A unilateral Palestinian declaration of sovereignty, claiming to be a state under international law, and being recognized by the United Nations, would certainly change the status of that territory.

To be sure, many countries around the world already recognize Palestine as an independent state. But U.N. recognition would grant an imprimatur on that status that could be fatal to the peace process between the Israelis and Palestinians.

What reason would remain, for example, for Israel to negotiate after the Palestinians just rejected one of the fundamental tenets of the peace process -- that issues will be decided between the parties and not by outside groups?

....The Obama administration should make clear that there will be consequences for such an ill-advised effort -- not just for the Palestinians themselves, but also for the United Nations if it chooses to give a voice to such an effort and for any third party country supporting it.

Netanyahu urges Abbas to resume direct talks in New York

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to resume direct negotiations with Israel in lieu of his unilateral statehood bid, set to be presented to the UN General Assembly on Friday.

Netanyahu - who is scheduled to fly to the US Tuesday evening - said that he would like to meet with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in New York:
"I call on the chairman of the Palestinian Authority to launch direct negotiations in New York and continue them in Jerusalem and Ramallah,I am offering President Abbas the chance to launch peace negotiations instead of wasting time on futile unilateral steps."

Ambassador Shaprio: Negotiations is the only solution to two national states for two people

(Jpost).US ambassador Dan Shapiro said Monday at a lecture to Haredi students at the Lander Institute in Jerusalem that the US believes that negotiations between the sides is the only solution to two states for two people: a Jewish state and a Palestinian state "that will live side by side in peace and security." Shapiro said that the difficulty in getting the sides back to negotiations stems from the deep distrust between the sides. He said that negotiations can only succeed if there is an understanding of the framework of the negotiations, something the US and the Quartet were currently working on. He said that these efforts would continue, even if there was a vote at the UN.


Shapiro said that the US was opposed to unilateral steps from either side, including an Israeli halt to the transfer of tax revenues to the PA, a move advocated by some in the government. Shapiro said this money paid the salaries of PA personnel who ensure normal life in the PA, and added that three days ago at the donor's conference in New York Israel supported providing funds to the PA. The security cooperation between Israel and the PA was important and should continue, he said.

David M. Weinberg/ By treating the Palestinians like a spoiled child, the world is pushing off the chances for peace

(David M. Weinberg-Israelhayom).Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s critics are harping that his “passivity” and “intransigence” have led Israel to its lowest international standing in four decades. They say that he has allowed his rivals to, as Thomas Friedman wrote Saturday in The New York Times, “seize the initiative and set the agenda.” They say that because of Netanyahu, Israel is entering this week's looming confrontation with the Palestinians weak and isolated.

The problem is that Netanyahu has put forward his own peace plan exactly along Tommy-the-oracle’s lines, and that both “friends” and foes have conveniently ignored it. Both at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar Ilan University in June 2009 and again in Congress earlier this year, Netanyahu set out a clear path: Two states for two peoples, with Israel making “painful” and “generous” withdrawals in order to make room for what Netanyahu foresaw as a “viable, independent and prosperous” Palestinian state.

Note that Netanyahu hasn’t visited a single settlement outside the main two settlement blocs; he froze all settlement construction for ten months; and he hasn’t really authorized any significant construction since. He told Congress that following a peace agreement, some settlements will end up beyond Israel’s borders, and he recently began tearing down outposts. Netanyahu seems to have reluctantly accepted the “1967 lines with land swaps” rubric too – even though that formulation by U.S. President Barack Obama is a crime against history.

In short, Netanyahu has bucked, not kowtowed to, his right-wing coalition partners and National Religious allies, and has moved to the center of the Israeli body-politic.

Benn and Friedman dismiss all this. Worse still, they forgive Mahmoud Abbas for his consistent refusal to enter real negotiations with Israel, for his inability and unwillingness to bend on any issue, and for his unilateral, aggressive U.N. diplomacy.

Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Obama are to blame for such hostile treatment of the Netanyahu government. They raised Palestinian and world expectations of Israeli concessions so high that it is only inevitable that Israel will experience a long period of global disgruntlement as Netanyahu correctly educates the world to lower its expectations.

Olmert handed Abbas a map with a 97 percent Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank marked on it, along with more than 100 settlements marked for destruction and a division of Jerusalem. Last fall, Obama spoke of his deep desire to recognize Palestinian statehood within a year, basically goading the PA into its unilateral-make-no-concessions mode.

Thus, Netanyahu is left with the unenviable job of dialing expectations down. A Palestinian state? Okay, but not when Abbas doesn’t have effective control over his own constituency and when tens of thousands of rockets are aimed at us from the territories. (Remember Hamas in Gaza?) Not on 97 percent of Judea and Samaria, and not under any “Judenrein” arrangements. Not without a security barrier in the Jordan Valley and on the Samarian hilltops. Not without an end to Palestinian attacks on Israel in global forums and an end to anti-Semitic broadcasts on PA television. Not without an end to Palestinian nonsense about refugee return to Israel. And no re-division of Jerusalem.

The Palestinians have a lot of climbing down and growing up to do if there is going to be a realistic peace deal. Yet the world continues to feed their unfettered aspirations and reward their recalcitrant behavior. Recognizing Palestine as a virtual “state” at the U.N. even though the Palestinians are not prepared to end the conflict with Israel would be yet another grave sin of global overindulgence of the Palestinians.

By ignoring Israel’s concessions for peace and constantly demanding more, while treating the Palestinians like a spoiled child who can never be told "no," the world is not advancing the chances for peace. It is further delaying them.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Tony Blair Working to Avoid UN 'Showdown' Over Palestinian Statehood

if you were following the Quartet's efforts over the past 3 years, to revive the peace talks, you would kinda chuckle to hear the Palestinians portraying Tony Blair as a Right wing likudnik....

This story from the Telegraph:
"Tony Blair has earned the fury of Palestinian leaders after he was accused of blatant pro-Israel bias for his role in attempting to derail their bid for statehood at the UN.


Nabil Shaath, a senior Palestinian negotiator, said Mr Blair's efforts had convinced Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, that he no choice but to press ahead with his UN bid and abandon all thoughts of compromise.


"I gulped," Mr Shaath said. "This was the statement that was supposed to persuade President Abbas not to go? Mr. Blair doesn't sound like a neutral interlocutor. He sounds like an Israeli diplomat sometimes."
Back to work...
(ABC news). Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Quartet's special envoy to the Middle East, told "This Week" anchor Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview that he is continuing to work to avert a showdown at the United Nations this week over Palestinian statehood, hoping to craft "a framework of reference" for renewing peace process negotiations.
"What we will be looking for over the next few days, is a way of putting together something that allows their claims and legitimate aspirations for statehood to be recognized while actually renewing the only thing that's going to produce a state, which is a negotiation directly between the two sides."

"I think there is a way of avoiding a confrontation or a showdown, The only way in the end we are going to get a Palestinian state, and this week is all about advancing Palestinian statehood, the only way to do it ultimately is through negotiation."

WBlair said he hopes agreeing on a framework for reviving negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis will create "a less confrontational atmosphere" and move the long-dormant peace process forward.

"We're trying to put together, in the Quartet body, that's the body of the international community, a statement that is essentially a framework of reference for the negotiations, So, it sets out … where we want to go on issues like borders. It describes all the main issues to be negotiated. And I think what's going to be really important is also to give some sense of a time frame ... for a successful negotiation.

"We haven't had proper negotiations now for really quite a long time, And what that means is that both sides become very frustrated with this situation. Both sides look for ways of advancing their position unilaterally rather than bilaterally or multilaterally ... even these difficult issues like settlements and so on, the only way of resolving them is to sit down and negotiate borders, security, refugees, Jerusalem, the core issues at stake here."

Abbas rejects Netanyahu far-reaching compromises submitted to Quarte envoy, Tony Blair

(Haaretz). The Palestinian Authority has rejected several attempts to sway it away from its statehood bid at the United Nations and toward resumed peace talks with Israel, Haaretz learned on Sunday, with sources saying that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas rebuffed proposals that included compromises by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Netanyahu has reportedly agreed to several compromises in regard to the Quartet statement's wording, specifically on issues such as the recognition of Israel as a Jewish state, among others.
*Regarding the proposed borders of a future Palestinian state, Netanyahu agreed to a vaguer wording concerning the West Bank's main settlement blocs - negotiations based on the 1967 borders, with land swaps, with borders that are not identical to those of 1967 and taking into account "demographic reality on the ground."

*On the subject of recognition of Israel as a Jewish state, Netanyahu agreed to compromise, and allow the statement to speak of two states for two as well as of two national states, without mentioning a "Jewish state."

*Netanyahu also agreed to be more flexible on the length of future negotiations as well as on security assurances. Netanyahu is prepared to agree to one year of peace talks.
Until this point, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has rejected all of the proposed draft statements, even those which included Netanyahu's revisions. Eventually, Quartet Mideast Envoy Tony Blair and American officials decided that a statement would be released regardless of any objections, in order to gauge the sides' responses later.

Bill Clinton: Palestinian UN bid won't change reality; US should try and 'contain negative fallout.'

Former US President Bill Clinton warned of the "negative consequences" of the Palestinian UN bid and said that the reality on the ground would not change after the vote and that both sides would have to return to the negotiating table.

Speaking to NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday, former president Clinton said that the United States must "contain the fallout" from the Palestinian UN bid expected later this week, adding that "when this is over the underlying reality won't change, and we still believe there should be a Palestinian state and we still believe that there should be cooperation between Israel and its Arab neighbors."

"Above all the Palestinian bid was an act of frustration by the Palestinians, and what I think we've all got to do is contain the negative fallout."

"The Palestinians knew that they have to negotiate borders and securities with the Israelis, they're just frustrated because they feel they have provided a secure environment, they have reinforced cooperation with the Israelis, they have produced a growing economy in the West Bank, they have renounced violence…and there's been no progress."

"So when they get the vote, which will be extremely positive, since most of the rest of the world thinks the Israelis have made an error not being more forthcoming with the government, and the U.S. vetoes it, which we will do because we're committed to Israel's security and that the idea that the two parties have to negotiate a solution".

"So I don't know what's going to happen, I just know that this is one of those deals where we're either going to go forward or fall back and I favor going forward, I don't think the fundamental realities have changed in 20 years."

Speaker Boehner: The U.S., must stand by Israel's side as a strong partner and reliable ally

(AP). House Speaker John Boehner In an address Sunday to the Jewish National Fund conference in Cincinnati,says the U.S. commitment to Israel should be stronger now as the American ally faces challenges to its existence in the volatile Middle East.
"The Jewish state stands above others as the one true beacon of freedom and opportunity in the region."
"The U.S., must stand by Israel's side not just as a broker or observer — but as a strong partner and reliable ally."

"Israel has shown that it seeks nothing more than peace ... a peace agreed to by the two states and only the two states."
Boehner, in his speech, did not mention Obama, but did recall his invitation to Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress, also in May, and the message the prime minister delivered.
"The American people deserved to hear from him — and Washington, quite frankly, needed to hear what he had to say, I invite the people in this room — and anyone as concerned as I am about the future of Israel — to speak out. Washington needs to hear from you, too."

Republican frontrunner Rick Perry stands at Israel's side ahead of UN vote

(Israelhayom).Texas governor and potential Republican presidential nominee Rick Perry called on the U.S. to stonewall the Palestinian declaration of statehood at the U.N. later this week, in an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal published on Friday.

Perry, who is leading in some polls as the top contender to square off against President Barack Obama in 2012, implored the Obama administration over the weekend not to abandon Israel, whom he calls an historic ally with "shared democratic principles."

He crtitcised to Obama administration Mideast policies that led to this gridlock:
"Unfortunate errors by the Obama administration have encouraged the Palestinians to take steps backward away from peace. It was a mistake to inject an Israeli construction freeze, including in Jerusalem, as an unprecedented precondition for talks. Indeed, the Palestinian leadership had been negotiating with Israel for years, notwithstanding settlement activity.

When the Obama administration demanded a settlement freeze, it led to a freeze in Palestinian negotiations.

It was a mistake to agree to the Palestinians’ demand for indirect negotiations conducted through the United States. And it was an even greater mistake for President Obama to distance himself from Israel and seek engagement with the hostile regimes in Syria and Iran.

Palestinian leaders have perceived this as a weakening of relations between Israel and the United States, and are trying to exploit it..."
Perry lashed out against the Palestinian bid, calling it an "insult to the U.S.," and even went so far as to suggest cutting off U.S. aid to the Palestinian Authority in light of its bypassing a negotiated settlement to the conflict in favor of U.N. recognition.
"The United States – and the United Nations – should do everything possible to discourage the Palestinian leadership from pursuing its current course.

The circumvention of serious negotiations by PA President Mahmoud Abbas demonstrates a basic failure of leadership and a betrayal of the true interests of the Palestinian people. The United States should oppose this measure by using our veto in the Security Council, as President Obama has pledged, and by doing everything we can to weaken support for the unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood in the General Assembly, even at this late date.

The United States must affirm that the precondition for any properly negotiated settlement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is the formal recognition of the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state behind secure borders.

Our aid is, and must remain, predicated on the commitment of the Palestinian leadership to engage honestly and directly with the Israelis in negotiating a peace settlement."
Israel Hayom has also learned that Perry plans to hold a pro-Israel press conference with American and Israeli-Jewish leaders in New York this week, to coincide with the Palestinian request at the U.N.

As governor of Texas Perry has repeatedly condemned President Obama's policies toward Israel. He has often cited his Christian faith as the reason for his support of Israel.

MK Danny Danon (Likud), who will participate at the press conference, said he would ask Perry ahead of the conference to adopt the initiative the MK is advancing to annex Judea and Samaria in response to the unilateral Palestinian moves at the UN.

Netanyahu: The Palestinians attempt to be accepted as a member of the U.N. will fail

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to travel to New York on Tuesday for a meeting Wednesday with U.S. President Barack Obama, at the start of the weekly cabinet meeting on Sunday Pm Netanyahu reiterated that he was heading to the U.N. to "convey the truth."
"The UN is not a place where Israel wins praise, but I think that it is important that I go there in order to represent both the State of Israel and the truth - and the truth is that Israel wants peace and the truth is that the Palestinians are doing everything to torpedo direct peace negotiations."

"They have ignored every proposal that I have made, both in my 14 June 2009 Bar-Ilan speech and in my 24 May 2011 speech to the US Congress. They have avoided coming to direct negotiations after this Government made an unprecedented decision to freeze new construction in the communities. For ten months, they simply were unwilling to come and negotiate. They need to understand that, despite their current attempt to again overturn the negotiations by going to the UN, peace will be achieved only through direct negotiations.."
"Their attempt to be accepted as a member of the U.N. will fail," Netanyahu continued. "It will fail because it must go through the U.N. Security Council. Decisions that are binding on U.N. members pass through the Security Council. I am convinced that the activity of the U.S., which is deeply cooperating with us, as well as the activity of other governments with which we are also cooperating, will result in the failure of this attempt."

Netanyahu also addressed the possibility that the General Assembly would vote in favor of recognizing a Palestinian state, saying:
"The UN also has the General Assembly in which almost any decision can be passed. It is possible to decide there that the sun rises in the west and sets in the east, and this would pass there. But it has neither the same weight nor the same importance. This is not the Palestinians' avowed goal. Even there it is possible that there will be various actions in their regard. We are coordinating our efforts with those of the US and with other important countries, in Europe and beyond."

Quartet to propose a framework that calls for recognition of Israel as a Jewish State and timeline for negotiations

(IsraelHayom).The U.S. and the Quartet of Middle East negotiators are working feverishly to get Israel and the Palestinians to relaunch peace talks in a last-ditch attempt to prevent a showdown over the Palestinian bid to seek recognition for an independent state at the U.N. later this week.

The Quartet on the Middle East, including the U.N., EU, Russia and the U.S., is slated to meet Sunday and has threatened to present a diplomatic framework even without the approval of Israel and the Palestinians. The Quartet is expected to urge the two sides to return to the negotiating table within a specific timetable. The group's statement is also expected to call for the creation of an independent Palestinian state on the basis of 1967 borders and will also refer to Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people.

The idea is that a new Quartet statement would specify that new Israeli-Palestinian negotiations would begin within four to six weeks -- with a specified end date, either in six months or a year.

"The Palestinians seemed open to it," Wexler said, cautioning that no side had made any commitments to support such a statement. "The Israelis are less excited about the timeline, but they understand the Palestinians can't just have an open time frame."

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Netanyahu: Israel will agree to upgrade of Palestinian status, as long as it is not declared a state

(Haaretz).Israel would agree to upgrade the Palestinian Authority's status at the United Nations as long as it is not declared a state, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in talks with Catherine Ashton, the European Union's foreign policy chief, over the past few days.

Netanyahu continued his talks with U.S. envoys Dennis Ross and David Hale on Thursday, as well as Ashton and Quartet envoy Tony Blair, in an attempt to reach a compromise that would prevent an Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the UN. But no breakthrough was made, and the PA's appeal to the United Nations next week is regarded as inevitable.

Netanyahu told his interlocutors that granting the PA the status of a state would allow the Palestinians to go to the International Criminal Court in The Hague over issues like settlement construction. "But as long as it is less than a state, I'm ready to talk about it," a source familiar with the conversation quoted him as saying.

One of Netanyahu's advisers also said that Israel would not object to the PA's status being upgraded as long as it is not recognized as a state.

Both U.S. officials and Blair have been pressuring Ashton over the past few days to quash a French-Spanish initiative under which the EU's 27 members would unanimously support a General Assembly resolution upgrading the PA's status at the United Nations to that of a nonmember state. This initiative would give the PA the same status the Vatican now has.

In exchange, the PA would not ask the Security Council to grant it full UN membership or file charges against Israelis in the ICC.

Ashton, who had come to the region to gauge the parties' response to the French-Spanish initiative, did not even discuss it due to this pressure. Instead, without consulting the EU member states, Ashton raised a proposal of her own that conformed to Netanyahu's position.

Under Ashton's proposal, the PA would be upgraded to a new legal status less than that of a state. Such a status currently does not exist at the United Nations, but would be created especially for this purpose.

This status would not give the PA the standing it would need to take Israelis to the ICC.

Netanyahu to address the UNGA - "I have decided to go and tell the truth"

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Thursday that he will travel to New York City and address the UN General Assembly ahead of the Palestinian bid for statehood. His address has been set for next Wednesday.


The announcement was made shortly after Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad al-Malki said that the Palestinian Authority will submit its bid for full UN membership with the UN Security Council on Friday, September 23.

Netanyahu met Thursday with Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas. Speaking at a press conferees held in Jerusalem after their meeting, Netanyahu said:
"I have decided to personally convey the message of direct negotiation and striving for peace at the General Assembly – I know Israel doesn’t get a fair hearing at the General Assembly. It has an automatic majority which is quick to denounce Israel. I have decided to go… to tell the truth."

"The only way for a Palestinian state to come to be is through negotiations. The PA's decision (to appeal to the UNSC) could change tomorrow. I'll be at the UN. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will be at the UN. We could save the trip – Ramallah is only 10 minutes away. Direct negotiations are the simplest way to achieve peace."

Ben Smith/ Egypt crisis fortifies U.S., Israel ties and Bibi/Obama relationship

(BEN SMITH-Politico).The politics of the Middle East often hinge on unexpected twists and turns of history - and one of those moments may have come Friday night, when the tumultuous and sometimes frosty relationship between President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems to have found a friendlier tone in the midst of a near-catastrophe.

Friday nights usually offer a rare respite for the intense post of U.S. Ambassador to Israel, but hours after sunset last Friday, Ambassador Dan Shapiro’s email inbox suddenly began lighting up. An angry crowd outside the Israeli Embassy in Cairo had begun to breach its outer walls, prompting fears that, even with Egyptian security forces standing by, the mob might overrun the embassy.

Shapiro took a call from the Israeli Foreign Ministry’s situation room, where Netanyahu and other top officials were gathered, tensely watching live video feeds from the embassy. Officials said the Israelis had been calling their Egyptian counterparts for hours, but had been unable to reach the newly transformed nation’s military leader, Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi.

Senior State Department officials had spoken to Egyptian officials and been assured a rescue was on the way – but “there was a gap between the sense of urgency and the response time,” Netanyahu aide Ron Dermer told POLITICO. The Israeli leaders, watching the live video, narrated the frightening scene to Shapiro.

“What I was hearing from the Foreign Ministry was so alarming that I basically said, ‘We’ve got to raise this to the top level - we need a call to Tantawi now,’ ” he said.

Shapiro helped jostle the U.S. government into an all-hands-on-deck response that officials in both countries credit with saving the lives of six Israeli guards trapped in an embassy safe room.

But the incident also proved something of a reality check for in the U.S.-Israel alliance, and a punctuation mark in the tense personal relationship Obama and Netanyahu, who placed his own call to Obama at 12:45 a.m. in Israel. The U.S. alliance with Israel was, in a moment of crisis, both reflexive and effective. Netanyahu’s thanks after the incident was unstinting. And the incident seemed to bind the countries closer together amid a brewing crisis in New York, as Palestinian leaders press the United Nations to grant them formal statehood.

“Arab spring and its breathlessness has turned into Arab winter and sober assessment. Israel’s fears become America’s and the desire and ability to pressure Bibi goes way down,” said Aaron David Miller, a former U.S. peace negotiator now at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in Washington.

There was less thought of those broader strategic consequences Friday night and Saturday morning in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and Washington, however, as Shapiro and other administration officials rang the alarm bells.

“They were within one door of getting at the guys who were inside. We were potentially within minutes of a tragedy,” Shapiro said. “There would have been bloodshed.”

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta had already tried to reach Tantawi to avoid the nightmare of a last stand between the well-armed Israelis and the mob, officials said. But as midnight passed in Jerusalem and Cairo, Obama – amid the sale of his jobs plan and briefings on the threat of a Sept. 11 anniversary terror attack — became personally involved as well, launching a new round of calls to senior Egytian leaders. After midnight, he spoke to Netanyahu to “express his great concern” about the situation, and to make public the pressure “on the government of Egypt to honor its international obligations to safeguard the security of the Israeli Embassy.”

Panetta finally spoke to Tantawi, reportedly around 1:00 a.m. in Cairo. Egyptian commandos arrived soon after, reportedly dressing the six Israelis in local garb and spiriting them out of the besieged embassy.

“The president’s quick and decisive action says we’re friends and we’ll do what we have to to help each other in crisis moments,” he said. “That’s not a question - that’s automatic. It’s a sign of the fundamental strength of the friendship.”

And while the U.S. Ambassador might be expected to credit the White House, the fulsome Israeli gratitude was unusual. Netanyahu, who infuriated the Americans this summer with a public lecture to Obama, said in an unusual Saturday morning address that “I want to use this opportunity to thank U.S. President Barack Obama.”
“I requested his assistance at a decisive — I would even say fateful — moment. He said he would do everything possible, and this is what he did, He activated all of the United States’ means and influence — which are certainly considerable. I believe we owe him a special debt of gratitude. This testifies to the powerful alliance between Israel and the United States. This alliance is especially vital in these days, in which we can witness fierce storms and upheavals in the Middle East.”
The Israeli and American Jewish press, often hostile to Obama, chimed in. The Orthodox newspaper Hamodia described him, with high religious praise, as a divine “instrument of salvation.

“In this test of standing by one’s allies in a matter of life and death, Barack Obama came through,” it wrote.

And Dermer says the U.S.-Israel relationship is at a high point.
“We’ve enjoyed a period over the last four months of very close coordination with the administration, probably the best coordination that we’ve had over the last two-and-a-half years over the range of issues,I think that we’re definitely in a good place, with the U.S. administration and us seeing a lot of things eye to eye.”

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Stunning Victory by Bob Turner - New York's District 9 hands Obama a Jewish 'thumping'

(Chemi Shalev-Haaretz).The Israeli flag prominently placed alongside the American Stars and Stripes at the Republican Party’s tumultuous victory celebrations in the New York borough of Queens on Wednesday night may one day come to be remembered as a symbol of a watershed moment in the political history of the Jewish community and American-Israeli relations.

Whether or not it was, in fact, the voters’ antipathy to President Barack Obama’s Israel policies that gave the hitherto unknown Republican candidate Bob Turner his stunning upset triumph in the special elections held in New York’s Ninth Congressional District yesterday is almost irrelevant now. In politics it is the perception that counts, and Wednesday’s unequivocal repudiation of Obama and the Democrats in one of the America’s most densely-populated Jewish areas will be portrayed, as the outspoken former Mayor Ed Koch put it, as a “message to President Obama that he cannot throw Israel under a bus with impunity “. And even though Turner’s Democratic opponent David Weprin is an observant Jew with a long record of strong support for Israel, in Brooklyn and Queens last night it may have seemed as if there was only one truly pro-Israel party in America, and it was not the one the Jews are used to voting for.
Bob Turner September 14, 2011 (AP)

Bob Turner delivers his victory speech during an election night party, Wednesday, Sept. 14, 2011 in New York.
Photo by: AP

Emboldened by their astonishing achievement in a district held by the rival Democrats throughout the past 88 years, the Republicans are bound to try and exploit their newly-found “wedge issue” in order to pry the proverbial “Jewish vote” away from its historic Democratic tilt. In the process, many Jewish leaders fear, the Republicans may irreparably erode the bedrock of bipartisanship that has characterized U.S. support for Israel for many decades. And by appealing to the Jews to “vote Israel” at the expense of all other considerations, they maintain, the Republicans may also be lending credence, albeit inadvertently, to the age-old canard of “dual loyalty” leveled at American Jews by their detractors.

It is true that pinning the dramatic loss of District 9 solely on Obama’s strained relationship with Israel and its prime minister is a bit of a hard sell, to say the least, on a day that the U.S. Census Bureau released grim economic statistics showing that the median income of American families is shrinking at a rate no less alarming than the pace at which American poverty is growing. It is also true that the Jews of the ninth Congressional District are a much more conservative lot than the Jewish community as a whole, and that the many ultra-Orthodox and Russian immigrants in the district probably didn’t vote for Obama in 2008 in the first place. Like their fellow Catholics, who apparently swung towards the Republicans in even greater numbers, the frum Jews may also have also been punishing Weprin for his support for gay marriage as well as exacting retroactive revenge for the collective shame brought on the district by former Congressman Anthony Weiner who was caught “sexting” - using Twitter to send nude photos of himself to various young women - and whose resignation last June triggered Wednesday's vote.

Be that as it may, there can be no doubt that Obama and the Democrats suffered a demoralizing “thumping” on Wednesday, to borrow the term used by former President George Bush after the Republicans’ stinging defeat in the 2006 Congressional election, which will be widely interpreted as a grim harbinger of the upcoming presidential ballot. Democratic Party leaders will surely hit the panic buttons now, pressuring Obama to create new jobs at almost any price - and to make amends with the party’s Jewish constituency at almost any cost.

The attempt to “mend fences” with Israel, already apparent in the Administration’s all-out effort against the Palestinian drive to achieve statehood at the United Nations and in its unabashed touting of its assistance to Israel in last week’s crisis in Cairo, is likely to intensify and thus to exacerbate Washington’s already strained relations with the Arab world. There couldn’t be better news, of course, for Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan’s ongoing efforts to capture Arab hearts and minds and, in that regard, the shot across Obama’s bow from the heavily-Jewish boroughs of Queens and Brooklyn may be heard around the world, at least for the 15 months leading up to the 2012 elections.

Obviously, Obama’s continuing misfortunes and diminishing prospects are a source of disappointment and dismay for the president’s dwindling ranks of supporters, Jewish or otherwise. Last night they may have tried to console themselves with a description of the main protagonist in the other, much more famous "District 9", the highly successful 2010 South African science fiction movie: “He was an honest man,” it goes, “and he didn't deserve any of what happened to him.”

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Why Israel matters in the NY9 special Congressional election

(Jacob Kornbluh).Being active on the ground (not as some opinion makers sitting on a computer in a comfortable a/c office) speaking with voters, identifying the issues they most resonate with, Israel is playing a large role, not so much against the Democratic candidate David Weprin, but for the simple reason, that president Obama supported by Weprin, has treated Israel very unfairly and unfriendly over the past 2 and 3/4 years.

Support for Israel, and particular in this district, is large among Jews and non-Jews alike, simple because its in America's best interest, as we share common values and strategic security interests...

This election as it attracted so much national and media attention, is an opportunity to send a message to Obama and the Democratic party, that the Jewish vote cannot be taken for granted, that being vocal supportive of Israel or publicly opposing Obama's policies is not enough, it requires extensive pressure and an ultimatum of party line support, to force Obama to change course, and pave a new path in the diplomatic as strategic relationship with Israel.

In addition, the Republican ruled Congress, that Bob Turner if elected will be part of that majority, is very pro Israel, not only in its vocal support for the Jewish state, but in legislative acts, sponsored and co-sponsored by republican freshman that share the passion and support for Israel with the American public.

By electing Bob Turner, a Catholic, strong supporter and friend from Israel, the Jewish voters in NY-9 will have a one in a life time opportunity to shape the narrative of support for Israel, in these challenging times..

Monday, September 5, 2011

Home Front Command Chief warns of 'radical Islamic winter' that may lead to regional war

Recent revolutions in the Arab world and the deteriorating ties with Turkey are raising the likelihood of a regional war in the Middle East, IDF Home Front Command Chief, Major General Eyal Eisenberg warned Monday, in a speech at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv.
"It looks like the Arab Spring, but it can also be a radical Islamic winter."

"This leads us to the conclusion that through a long-term process, the likelihood of an all-out war is increasingly growing."

"Iran has not abandoned its nuclear program. The opposite it true; it continues full steam ahead, In Egypt, the army is collapsing under the burden of regular security operations, and this is reflected in the loss of control in the Sinai and the turning of the border with Israel into a terror border, with the possibility that Sinai will fall under the control of an Islamic entity."

"In Lebanon, Hezbollah is growing stronger within government arms, but it has not lost its desire to harm Israel, and the ties with Turkey aren't at their best."

"This raises the likelihood of an all-out, total war, with the possibility of weapons of mass destruction being used."
During his address, the senior IDF official revealed that new, more lethal arms surfaced in the hands of Gaza terror groups during the latest round of fighting in the area. As result of the disturbing development, Israeli civilians were instructed to adopt greater precautions, he said.
"We discovered a new weapon, and as result of this we instructed the public to hide under two roofs, rather than only one."

Netanyahu: Palestinians doing all they can to avoid peace talks

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday blamed the Palestinians for the impasse in the peace process, saying "I'm ready to begin negotiations immediately, but the Palestinians are doing all they can to avoid direct negotiations," Israel Radio reported.

Speaking during a meeting with his Belgian counterpart Yves Leterme, Netanyahu said that the Palestinian refusal to begin negotiations was an error on their part "because they need peace as much as we do." The prime minister stated that he was willing to go to Ramallah for peace talks.

Netanyahu: Israel will not apologize for defending itself

(Israelhayom).Israel regrets the loss of life during the battle on the Mavi Marmara in May 2010, and hopes a way will be found to repair the damaged relations with Turkey, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday.

Speaking at the weekly cabinet meeting, Netanyahu said, "Israel never intended for relations with Ankara to deteriorate, and we are not interested in a deterioration now."

Netanyahu was speaking two days after Turkey downgraded ties with Israel to their lowest diplomatic level, expelled Israel's ambassador, canceled all military agreements, and threatened to pursue Israel's Gaza blockade policy at the International Criminal Court, as the U.N.'s Palmer report into the Gaza-bound flotilla incident, was leaked to The New York Times before its official release on Friday
"The U.N.'s Palmer report confirms what we knew from the start: That we reserve the right to defend ourselves and that we acted in accordance with international law."

"We will not apologize for our Naval Commandos defending themselves against violent activists from the Turkish IHH organizations, and we will not apologize for working to stop the smuggling of weapons to the Hamas terror organization which fires at our civilians".
The prime minister promised his government would act to protect the naval commandos who took part in the raid on the Marmara from possible legal action against them by the Turkish government.

An Israeli official pointed out Saturday that the report "not only calls the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza legitimate, it also concludes that there is no humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, and that anyone who wishes to send humanitarian aid to Gaza must coordinate it with Israel and the Palestinian Authority to have it transported through the overland crossing points."

Vice Premier and Minister for Strategic Affairs Moshe (Bogey) Ya'alon, the senior Israeli minister dispatched to Turkey over the past few months, on Sunday said Israel was right not to apologize for the flotilla incident.

"I was sent to negotiate with the Turks three times. They demanded an apology, compensation, and a lifting of the naval blockade on Gaza. I saw no intention on their part to show flexibility, nor any goodwill," Ya'alon told Army Radio.
"Turkey has not cut off all ties with us. Trade has actually increased, and even some defense ties are continuing. This issue did not start with the flotilla. [Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip] Erdogan looked to the East, to our worst enemies. Erdogan wanted to show our neighbors how he defeated and humiliated Israel, even when there was a U.N. report that was in Israel's favor. That was his aim, to humiliate us. And that is a strategic issue".